CIPR | Center For Inter-American Policy & Research

Tulane University

RGM

RGM: Research Group MEGA: Mobilization, Extractivism, and Government Action

Research Group MEGA is a network of scholars investigating the impact of contentious action against mega-development projects on policy and governmental institutional change. We refer specifically to big projects with local costs that generate protest or contentious action more broadly, such as mines, dams, and extensive capital-intensive agribusiness. Through this work, we seek to contribute to the emerging literature on the policy and institutional consequences of contentious politics.

The significance of this research is connected to the now decades old trend of expanding democracy and increased citizen rights in most of Latin America. For democratic polities it raises questions about the responsiveness of government to citizen interests and preferences. For democratic governance our research addresses key aspects of the sources and direction of change in governance regimes related to environment and development.

Research Group MEGA’s primary activities involve creating spaces for debate by sponsoring regular workshops, panels at major international conferences, and the publication of a working paper series. We aim to create a nexus with networks researching related questions and, more generally, to become a resource for investigators working on similar issues.

Our Working Paper Series includes papers by our research group members to share work in progress and to encourage discussion among researchers working on similar topics:

Working Paper 1. “Pushing the Envelope? Mega-Projects, Contentious Action, and Change” by Eduardo Silva

Working Paper 2. “The Policy and Institutional Effects of Resistance in Costa Rica’s Energy Sector: A Case Study” by Ludovico Feoli

Working Paper 3. “From the Streets to the Chamber: Social Movements and the Mining Ban in El Salvador” by Rose J. Spalding

Working Paper 4. “Mega-Projects, Contentious Politics, and Institutional and Policy Change: Chile, 1994-2017” by Eduardo Silva

Core members of Research Group MEGA offer broad coverage of the Latin American region and of key extractive sectors. Collectively participants represent North American, European, and United States-based South American scholarship.

Research Group MEGA is: Barbara Hogenboom, Center for Documentation and Research on Latin America, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Anthony Bebbington, Clark University, USA; Kathryn Hochstetler, London School of Economics, Great Britain; Lorenzo Pellegrini, Institute for Social Studies, The Netherlands; Rose Spalding, DePaul University, USA; Paul Haslam, University of Ottawa, Canada; Amalia Leguizamón, Tulane University, USA, Manuel Vogt, Princeton University, USA; Ludovico Feoli, Director, Center for Inter-American Policy and Research, Tulane University, USA; Eduardo Silva, Tulane University, USA.

Useful Links:
Environmental Justice Atlas
Observatorio de Conflictos Mineros de América Latina
The State of the World’s Rivers Database

Related Articles:

Arce, Moisés, Marc S. Polizzi, and Bryce Reeder. Forthcoming. Resource Extraction and Protest Participation in Latin America

Ballón, Eduardo, Raúl Molina, Claudia Viale, and Carlos Monge. 2017. Mining and Institutional Frameworks in the Andean Region. Lima: Natural Resource Governance Institute.

Ballón, Eduardo, Claudia Viale, Carlos Monge, Fernando Patzy, and Lorena de la Puente. 2017. La Agenda de la Sociedad Civil frente a las Industrias Extractivas en América Latina. Lima: Natural Resource Governance Institute.

Delamaza, Gonzalo, Antoine Maillet, and Christian Martínez Neira. 2017. Socio-Territorial Conflicts in Chile: Configuration and Politicization (2005-2014). ERLACS 104: 23-46.

Haslam, Paul. 2018. Beyond voluntary: state-firm bargaining over corporate social responsibilities in mining Review of International Political Economy.

Pellegrini, Lorenzo. 2018. Imaginaries of Development through Extraction: The ‘History of Bolivian Petroleum’ and the Present View of the Future Geoforum 90: 130-141.

LATEST SITE UPDATES

NEWS

EVENTS

PEOPLE

All Events

Upcoming Events

CIPR talk series Critical Issues in Democratic Governance to host political economist Dr. Katrina Burgess

View Full Event Description

Join the Center for Inter-American Policy and Research and the Stone Center for Latin American Studies in welcoming Dr. Katrina Burgess as part of the fall speaker series Critical Issues in Democratic Governance, on Friday, November 16, in 110A Jones Hall. Dr. Burgess will give a talk titled Courting Migrants: How States Make Diasporas and Diasporas Make States.

The event is free and open to the public. Please RSVP to cipr@tulane.edu.

Katrina Burgess (Ph.D., Princeton University) is Associate Professor of Political Economy of Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. She is author of Parties and Unions in the New Global Economy, which won the 2006 Outstanding Book Award for the best publication on labor issues granted by the Section on Labor Studies and Class Relations of the Latin American Studies Association, and co-editor with Abraham F. Lowenthal of The California-Mexico Connection. She has also published numerous book chapters, as well as articles in World Politics, Latin American Politics & Society, Studies in Comparative International Development, South European Politics and Society, Comparative Political Studies, Politica y gobierno, and International Studies Review. Dr. Burgess has also served as Assistant Director of the U.S.-Mexico Project at the Overseas Development Council in Washington, D.C. and Associate Director of the California-Mexico Project at USC in Los Angeles.

Patterns of migrant engagement in politics back home cannot be understood without examining the ways in which homeland states reach out to their migrants. Since states engaged in what can be called diaspora-making are unable to deploy many of the tools of rule within their borders, they are especially reliant on the cultivation of loyalty. The agents, motives, and loyalty-cultivation strategies of diaspora-making have important implications for whether homeland parties mobilize voters abroad, as demonstrated by the contrasts between Mexico and the Dominican Republic.